BLOWING OPEN THE DEEP STATE – END GAME
Products from Amazon.com
Price: Check on Amazon
Price: $20.99Was: $35.00
Price: Check on Amazon
Price: Check on Amazon
Price: $19.49Was: $29.99
Price: $5.45Was: $7.99
Price: $16.25Was: $28.00
Price: $8.99Was: $14.99
Products from Amazon.com
When Russian planes stray into UK airspace especially bombers and fighters, the pilot is not a Russian military man – oh no! He is none other than the Russian tooth fairy. It is the same when submarines go down the UK channel again the captain is this Russian Tooth fairy. The Tooth fairy is very rich has money left for children’s teeth in Russia he collects so has lots of cash.
He has a big log cabin in Siberia which is filled with all sorts of stuff – Radioactive isotopes, Nerve agents, ricin, james bond style equipment, training manuals. The tooth fairy does not age like us mortal men.
What the Tooth fairy hates as he is very Nationalistic is double agents especially those born in Russia.
The tooth fairy could pay to send a hit man to kill these agents but where would the fun be it that.
He wants to test the defence of the country the double agent is living in, see how they solve the clues and if they can detect his crimes.
He wants to cost the host country a lot in money to clean up the radioactivity or nerve agents.
he does not give a shit.
He has killed in London using radiation in tea, in Salisbury with Nerve gas.
Has killed over 20 agents just in the UK.
But what does the Uk do? we let Russians buy expensive homes in London and buy their gas and vodka. We need to stop all trade with Russsia until they stop this daft Tooth Fairy’s antics.
The Tooth Fairy only has one friend he trusts called Mr Nitup a bald man who is a very rich man thanks to his Mafia pals.
JFK warned the American people in a speech that America was controlled by a secret organisation. This machine combined military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its dissenters are silenced. What cost JFK his life was an executive order in June 1963 which was to print £4 billion dollars for the U.S treasury. This would have stripped the Illuminati and Federal Reserve of its power. He also wanted to inspect the nuclear plant at Dimona. Under JFK aid to Israel was £40 million, in 1966 it was £130 million and 70 percent of this was used for war related materials.
Kennedy was killed through an organisation called Permindex a Mossad /M16 front company. When 911 happened a plane hit the Pentagon killed accountants looking into large amounts of missing money. Another plane hit exactly on the tower where the servers were that recorded money transactions. To investigate any crime you follow the money. No one is told about the 6 dancing Israelis who were filming the towers before the plane hit or the fact a photo taken inside the tower shows a room rented by Israeli students and you can see clearly lots of electric fuse boxes in the background. Why would students need fuse boxes? Gadaffi wanted a single currency for all of Africa this would have weakened the dollar. All petrol is sold in dollars and cleared through American clearing houses. Saddam wanted to sell in Euro’s and to whom he wanted. Enrico Mattei, leader of Italy wanted to smash up the oil cartels; he was assassinated by a car bomb. Charles De Gaulle expelled Permindex after a failed assignation attempt on him. The rich 1 percent has more money that the other 99 percent of the planet combined. If the devil is alive then he would be a Rothschild.
There is good and bad in all religions. Yet when the Roman Empire existed some Jews followed the Roman Army around to buy and then sell the captured slaves in other parts of the empire. Jews also owned many of the slave ships carrying Africans to America and also owned these African slaves in America. American politics are dominated by Israel and most American mainstream media companies like Fox and CNN are owned by Jewish families. We never get to hear about the 20 million Christians killed in Russia by Bolsheviks who were mainly Jewish. There is evidence in some parts of the world of Jews sacrificing children for their religion. We also must note that many who consider themselves Jewish have no Jewish DNA but are descended from Khazars.
There is no evidence that Moses parted the red sea it is just a fairy story. There is no legal claim that Israel belongs to the Jews. Jews consider themselves Gods chosen people! This means they see the rest of us as Goyem.
We must be free to criticise all religions and have the real truth of history revealed. The Germans only began to hate the Jews after World War 1 when they found out about the Balfour agreement. Israel belongs to the Rothschild’s.
The school of Frankfurt that moved to America during World War 2 is behind Cultural Marxism and most original members were Jews. They wanted to make the west so corrupt it stank. When I see Israel opening its doors to the thousands of refugees in that part of the world I might think differently about Israel. Yet all White lands are expected to diversify but not Arab, Asian or African.
They will probably say I am anti-Semitic for writing this yet the word Semite just means a group of languages including Arabic and Jewish.
Almost as soon as it appeared, in 1991, The Secret Relationship generated a controversy that centered more on its intentions than its scholarship. The noise level was heightened in 1993 by the turmoil that swirled around Professor Tony Martin, of Wellesley College. A tenured professor in Wellesley’s Department of Africana Studies, Martin assigned to one of his classes portions of the book, which singles out Jews for special prominence in the Atlantic slave trade and for having played a particularly prominent role in the enslavement of Africans in the Americas. He was accused of anti-Semitism, and wrote a brief book to refute the charges. The title of Martin’s book, The Jewish Onslaught: Despatches From the Wellesley Battlefront, gave a clear preview of his opinions. It was a mixture of discussion, factual refutation, and angry recrimination. This last predominated, with paragraphs that opened using language like “To the Jews, and to their favourite Negroes who have insisted on attacking me I say . . .” His views on The Secret Relationship‘s use of historical materials amounted to a barrage of enthusiastic endorsements. Ironically, Martin’s assertion that “Jews were very much in the mainstream of European society as far as the trade in African human beings was concerned” was very close to what many Jewish scholars had claimed some thirty years before.
Martin, in one of his endorsements, made a startling assertion concerning slave ownership by Jews: “Using the research of Jewish historians, the book suggests that based on the 1830 census, Jews actually had a higher per capita slave ownership than for the white population as a whole.” The Secret Relationship does in fact approach making that suggestion, and since the claim would appear to be a pivotal one, it is worth examining.
In order to assess such a claim, one must resort to details. Martin’s purported actuality is wrong on its face if applied to the “white population” of the United States “as a whole,” because in 1830 only a handful of white northerners still owned slaves. Jews were concentrated in the North, and they constituted a very small minority there. Even if the statement is taken as applying only to the states in the American South that had not adopted gradual emancipation laws, it remains badly flawed. A careful and honest footnote in The Secret Relationship reveals that “Jewish scholars” had concluded that Jews in the South lived mostly in towns and cities. Neither this book nor Martin’s explains the significance of this fact. In actuality, slave ownership was much more common in southern urban areas than in the southern countryside. The relatively high proportion of Jewish slaveholding was a function of the concentration of Jews in cities and towns, not of their descent or religion. It is also the case that urban slaveholders of whatever background owned fewer slaves on average than rural slaveholders, including those on large plantations. Thus the proportion of slaveholders has never been an accurate measure of the social or economic importance of slaveholding, unless it is assessed on a broadly regional or state-by-state basis. In this instance, as in so many others, the statistical data do not stand up and cry out their own true significance.
The book is interesting in many respects. It has an unnamed editor and provides no indication of personal authorship. The title page declares that it was “Prepared by The Historical Research Department [of] The Nation of Islam,” but does not explain why this is “Volume One” or what may be offered in ensuing volumes. The book is ostensibly a scholarly work, replete with a short bibliography and a huge collection of footnotes. Its opening “Note on Sources” asserts that it “has been compiled primarily from Jewish historical literature.”
A second title page of The Secret Relationship announces that “Blacks and Jews have recently begun to question their relationship and its strategic role in their individual development” and that the book “is intended to provide an historical perspective for intellectual debate of this crucial social matter.” The word “individual” raises the question whether persons or groups are intended. Individual African-Americans and individual Jews as persons? Or two distinct individual groups?
As for the mechanics of scholarship, they present a central difficulty. The footnotes are extremely difficult to check in the form in which they are presented: although they follow the custom (in common with most of the humanities but not the social sciences) of providing a complete citation upon first mention and a shortened author-title-page version for ensuing ones, and are placed at the bottom of the page, they are numbered consecutively–all 1,275 of them–rather than starting afresh with each chapter. A reader encountering a brief reference to a presumably important article on Jewish slaveholding in the South (such as one on page 304, in footnote No. 1,238) can find a fuller citation–on page 91, in footnote No. 349–only after nearly an hour of thumbing through the book. Having gone this far, the reader must then consult the “Footnote Abbreviations” at the beginning of the book in order to discover a reference that might be usable in a library. The citation names a three-volume work edited by Abraham J. Karp. Upon consulting that work, which actually has five volumes, one learns that the article in question is by Bertram W. Korn. The same article by Korn is listed in The Secret Relationship‘s “Selected Bibliography,” but in another set of volumes, with an incorrect date and no indication that it was reprinted elsewhere several times.